From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:23:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623142335.A5564@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
I hope there's no need to explain this in the email; if there is, the
entry isn't good enough. 8)
However, wouldn't it be a good idea if this file was ordered by "when" ?
A quick scan of the file reveals a couple of overdue/forgotten items
(maybe they happened but the entry in the file got missed?):
What: ACPI S4bios support
When: May 2005
What: register_ioctl32_conversion() / unregister_ioctl32_conversion()
When: April 2005
diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x *.orig -x *.rej orig/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt linux/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
--- orig/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt Sat May 28 20:58:15 2005
+++ linux/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt Thu Jun 23 14:19:05 2005
@@ -83,3 +83,13 @@ Why: Deprecated in favour of the new ioc
more efficient. You should really be using libraw1394 for raw1394
access anyway.
Who: Jody McIntyre <scjody@steamballoon.com>
+
+---------------------------
+
+What: register_serial/unregister_serial
+When: December 2005
+Why: This interface does not allow serial ports to be registered against
+ a struct device, and as such does not allow correct power management
+ of such ports. 8250-based ports should use serial8250_register_port
+ and serial8250_unregister_port instead.
+Who: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-23 13:23 Russell King [this message]
2005-06-23 13:54 ` [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file Andi Kleen
2005-06-23 14:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-23 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-23 18:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 21:38 ` Dave Airlie
2005-06-23 19:13 ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-25 2:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-25 9:47 ` Russell King
2005-06-25 9:57 ` Russell King
2005-06-27 0:36 ` David McCullough
2005-06-27 9:30 ` Russell King
2005-07-14 19:33 ` Russell King
2005-08-12 17:30 ` Max Asbock
2005-08-15 8:42 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050623142335.A5564@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.