From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, shai@scalex86.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:28:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050624045854.GA6465@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506232005030.28244@graphe.net>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:10:06PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The dst_entry structure contains an atomic counter that is incremented and
> decremented for each network packet being sent. If there is a high number of
> packets being sent from multiple processors then cacheline bouncing between
> NUMA nodes can limit the tcp performance in a NUMA system.
>
> The following patch splits the usage counter into counters per node.
>
Do we really need to do a distributed reference counter implementation
inside dst cache code ? If you are willing to wait for a while,
we should have modified Rusty's bigref implementation on top of the
interleaving dynamic per-cpu allocator. We can look at distributed
reference counter for dst refcount then and see how that can be
worked out.
Thanks
Dipankar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-24 3:04 [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 3:10 ` [PATCH] dst numa: Avoid dst counter cacheline bouncing Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 3:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 4:58 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2005-06-24 5:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 7:29 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-06-24 3:36 ` [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction David S. Miller
2005-06-24 3:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 3:47 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 3:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 3:54 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 4:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 4:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 6:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 6:16 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-24 10:57 ` [PATCH] bugfix and scalability changes in net/ipv4/route.c Eric Dumazet
2005-06-28 20:14 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050624045854.GA6465@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=christoph@lameter.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.