From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:08:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20050625210820.GA26946@thunk.org> References: <42B86027.3090001@namesys.com> <20050621195642.GD14251@wotan.suse.de> <42B8C0FF.2010800@namesys.com> <84144f0205062223226d560e41@mail.gmail.com> <42BB0151.3030904@suse.de> <20050623114318.5ae13514.akpm@osdl.org> <20050623193247.GC6814@suse.de> <1119717967.9392.2.camel@localhost> <42BDAF3D.6060809@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42BDAF3D.6060809@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Pekka Enberg , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Jeff Mahoney , penberg@gmail.com, ak@suse.de, flx@namesys.com, zam@namesys.com, vs@thebsh.namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:23:41PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > >> > >> assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0); > >> > Lots of people like corporate anonymity. Some don't. I don't. I like > knowing who wrote what. It helps me know who to pay how much. It helps > me know who to forward the bug report to. Losing your anonymity > exposes you, mostly for better since more communication is on balance a > good thing, but the fear is there for some. I don't think we can agree > on this, it is an issue of the soul. Fallacy. The assert doesn't tell you who is at fault; it tells you who placed the assert which triggered; it could have triggered due to bugs caused by anyone, including the propietary binary-only module from Nvidia which the user loaded into his system.... - Ted