From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Domen Puncer Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:56:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] bonding - a trailing whitespace Message-Id: <20050628135644.GD3904@nd47.coderock.org> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============61906626976150458==" List-Id: References: <20050623193023.GF4398@voyager> In-Reply-To: <20050623193023.GF4398@voyager> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============61906626976150458== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 28/06/05 15:47 +0200, Carlo Perassi wrote: > > Why not just > > static u32 arp_target[BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS]; > > ... and include in the uninitialize static variables patch? > > it is already included in > [PATCH] [RESEND] bonding - uninitialize static variables Jup, just noticed, sorry. (Note to self: read mails from bottom up) --===============61906626976150458== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============61906626976150458==--