From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261904AbVGERrT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:47:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261920AbVGERrS (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:47:18 -0400 Received: from 39.3.78.83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.78.3.39]:24883 "EHLO kestrel.twibright.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261904AbVGERpF (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:45:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:16:00 +0200 From: Karel Kulhavy To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: man sendto ENOBUFS desc. wrong Message-ID: <20050705171600.GA18778@kestrel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Orientation: Gay User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org man send(2): " ENOBUFS The output queue for a network interface was full. This gener- ally indicates that the interface has stopped sending, but may be caused by transient congestion. (Normally, this does not occur ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ in Linux. Packets are just silently dropped when a device queue ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ overflows.)" ^^^^^^^^^^ Which is not true, because just happened to me with kernel Linux version 2.6.11-gentoo-r9. Where should I report? CL<