From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Run PCI driver initialization on local node
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:13:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050706181349.GN21330@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0507061058260.30702@graphe.net>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:01:14AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:35:32AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Instead of adding messy kmalloc_node()s everywhere run the
> > > > PCI driver probe on the node local to the device.
> > > > Then the normal NUMA aware allocators do the right thing.
> > >
> > > That depends on the architecture. Some do round robin allocs for periods
> > > of time during bootup. I think it is better to explicitly place control
> >
> > slab will usually do the right thing because it has a forced
> > local node policy, but __gfp might not.
>
> GFP allocs may not do the right thing. If you want to do this then it
> may be best to set the memory policy to restrict allocations to the node
> on which the device resides.
They will do the right thing. Under memory pressue on the node
it is better to back off than to fail.
>
> Plus there are CPU less nodes. What happens to those?
They are not worse off that they are now.
>
> > Patching every driver in existence? That sounds like a lot of
> > work.
>
> No just patch those that would benefit from it. The existing
This would be "all devices that SGI ships on Altixes" ?
IMHO all can benefit.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-06 13:32 [PATCH] Run PCI driver initialization on local node Andi Kleen
2005-07-06 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-06 17:56 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-06 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-06 18:13 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-07-06 18:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-06 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-06 19:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 10:39 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-07 13:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 14:13 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050706181349.GN21330@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=christoph@lameter.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.