From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [no more]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:52:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050708085253.GA1177@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57445.195.245.190.94.1120812419.squirrel@www.rncbc.org>
* Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org> wrote:
> OK.
>
> Just for the heads up, here goes todays summary results regarding my
> jack_test4.2 test suite against 2.6.12 kernels configured with
> PREEMPT_RT, but... now with 99.9% certainty :)
thanks for the testing!
> ------------------------------ ------------- -------------
> RT-V0.7.51-13 RT-V0.7.49-01
> ------------------------------ ------------- -------------
> Delay Maximum . . . . . . . . : 333 295 usecs
> Cycle Maximum . . . . . . . . : 970 943 usecs
> Average DSP Load. . . . . . . : 45.7 44.4 %
> Average CPU System Load . . . : 15.6 16.3 %
> Average CPU User Load . . . . : 32.0 30.1 %
i'm wondering - is this slight increase in CPU utilization (and
latencies) due to natural fluctuations, or is it a genuine overhead
increase?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-08 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1119299227.20873.113.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <20050621105954.GA18765@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1119370868.26957.9.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <20050621164622.GA30225@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1119375988.28018.44.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <1120256404.22902.46.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <20050703133738.GB14260@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1120428465.21398.2.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
2005-07-07 18:46 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-07 18:53 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [2] Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-07 19:49 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 23:19 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-08 8:46 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [no more] Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-08 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-07-08 9:40 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-08 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-08 10:53 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-11 15:12 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-11 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-11 22:00 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-11 22:09 ` Rui Nuno Capela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050708085253.GA1177@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.