From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:55:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([IPv6:::ffff:62.254.210.129]:5907 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:55:21 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j68Dtqt7007446; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:55:52 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j68Dtq6M007445; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:55:52 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:55:52 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux Message-ID: <20050708135551.GD2816@linux-mips.org> References: <20050708091711Z8226352-3678+1954@linux-mips.org> <20050708120238.GA2816@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8409 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 01:12:55PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > Protect noat assembly with .set push/pop and make it somewhat readable. > > > > It doesn't need protction. > > Are you absolutely sure future versions of GCC won't default to ".set > noat" for inline asm? I am not; in fact the opposite is not unlikely. Indeed - but everybody is free to shoot himself into the foot. With uzis even. Does that make it a good idea? Ralf