All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
To: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	bfields@fieldses.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
	mike@waychison.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 20:03:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050708180302.GC1165@wiggy.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFF7ECFC50.4EDB3D93-ON88257038.0059F048-88257038.005AEAF4@us.ibm.com>

Previously Bryan Henderson wrote:
> Two advantages of the enum declaration that haven't been mentioned yet, 
> that help me significantly:

There is another one: with enums the compiler checks types for you.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-08 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1120816072.30164.10.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] shared subtree Ram
     [not found] ` <1120816229.30164.13.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:25   ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree Ram
2005-07-08 11:17     ` Pekka Enberg
2005-07-08 12:19       ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-08 12:26         ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-08 12:46           ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-08 12:58             ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-08 13:34               ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-08 16:17                 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-07-08 16:33                 ` share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum Bryan Henderson
2005-07-08 16:57                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-08 17:16                     ` Bryan Henderson
2005-07-08 18:21                       ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-08 19:11                         ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-08 19:33                           ` Pekka Enberg
2005-07-08 19:59                             ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-10 18:21                               ` Pekka Enberg
2005-07-10 18:40                                 ` randy_dunlap
2005-07-10 19:14                                 ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-11  6:37                                   ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-11 17:13                                   ` Horst von Brand
2005-07-11 17:57                                     ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-10 19:16                                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-07-11 17:18                                   ` Horst von Brand
2005-07-08 19:38                           ` Ram
2005-07-08 22:12                         ` Bryan Henderson
2005-07-10 10:55                     ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-07-08 18:03                   ` Wichert Akkerman [this message]
2005-07-08 18:10                     ` Mike Waychison
2005-07-08 18:15                       ` Wichert Akkerman
2005-07-08 20:23                         ` Mike Waychison
2005-07-10 21:57                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-08 16:29       ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree Ram
2005-07-08 14:32     ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-07-08 16:19       ` Ram
2005-07-08 16:51         ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-07-08 17:52           ` Ram
2005-07-08 19:49             ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-07-14  1:27               ` Ram
2005-07-18 11:06                 ` shared subtrees implementation writeup Miklos Szeredi
2005-07-18 17:18                   ` Ram Pai
     [not found]   ` <1120816355.30164.16.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:25     ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] unclone a subtree Ram
     [not found]     ` <1120816436.30164.19.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:25       ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] bind/rbind a shared/private/slave/unclone tree Ram
     [not found]       ` <1120816521.30164.22.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:25         ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] move " Ram
     [not found]         ` <1120816600.30164.25.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:25           ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] umount " Ram
     [not found]           ` <1120816720.30164.28.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:26             ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] clone a namespace containing " Ram
     [not found]             ` <1120816835.30164.31.camel@localhost>
2005-07-08 10:26               ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] automounter support for shared/slave/private/unclone Ram
2005-07-08 10:26                 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] pnode.c optimization Ram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050708180302.GC1165@wiggy.net \
    --to=wichert@wiggy.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=hbryan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mike@waychison.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.