From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261607AbVGIQrC (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:47:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261614AbVGIQrB (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:23450 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261607AbVGIQqz (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:46:55 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:46:37 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: randy_dunlap Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, arjanv@infradead.org, guichaz@gmail.com Subject: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86 Message-ID: <20050709164637.GA16517@elte.hu> References: <20050709144116.GA9444@elte.hu> <20050709152924.GA13492@elte.hu> <20050709094455.0ef508e3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050709094455.0ef508e3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * randy_dunlap wrote: > Just to clarify this, "boot tested" does not mean that this changed > code was tested, right? or do you have a test case that was tested? i tested segfaults, but not bus-faults. The bug would have resulted in sigsegv being delivered not a sigbus. Ingo