From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from mx02.qsc.de ([IPv6:::ffff:213.148.130.14]:50607 "EHLO mx02.qsc.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:24:50 +0100 Received: from port-195-158-170-192.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.170.192] helo=hattusa.textio) by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Ds3uO-0007UB-00 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:25:40 +0200 Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Ds3uO-0004yZ-AT for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:25:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:25:40 +0200 To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux Message-ID: <20050711192540.GN1586@hattusa.textio> References: <20050711170613Z8226486-3678+2546@linux-mips.org> <20050711173104.GM2765@linux-mips.org> <20050711175337.GN2765@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Thiemo Seufer Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8449 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ths@networkno.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > If there's a mistake that people can do they will rarely miss that > > opportunity. Desperate users tend to move modules from their > > distribution into a kernel built from CVS or change kernel config options > > and somehow manage to keep a few modules built with the old options etc. > > Hmm... > > > It's no fun receiving bug reports only to later figure out it was just > > a silly pilot error, so for anything that's going to the net I really > > keep that option on. > > Well, I receive virtually zero bug reports for the DECstation. The code > must be perfect. ;-) I hope to change that with a 2.6 DECstation kernel for Debian. :-) Thiemo