From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261965AbVGLDMo (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:12:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262268AbVGLDMc (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:12:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:51854 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262184AbVGLDMC (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:12:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:11:17 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org, rolandd@cisco.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/29v2] InfiniBand core update Message-Id: <20050711201117.72539977.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1121136330.4389.5093.camel@hal.voltaire.com> References: <1121110249.4389.4984.camel@hal.voltaire.com> <20050711170548.31605e23.akpm@osdl.org> <1121136330.4389.5093.camel@hal.voltaire.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > I'll tentatively consider this material to be not-for-2.6.13? > > Presuming that "this material" refers to the patch to add the kernel CM > implementation, if kernel CM does not make 2.6.13, then user CM should > not either as it is dependent on it. Well I was asking. Do you guys think that this material is appropriate to and safe enough for 2.6.13? What are "user CM" and "kernel CM"?