From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Harper Subject: Re: nightly snapshots have 2.6.11 sparse tree Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:35:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20050713153558.GC28623@us.ibm.com> References: <20050713151656.GB28623@us.ibm.com> <20050713153122.GA12395@snarc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050713153122.GA12395@snarc.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Vincent Hanquez Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org * Vincent Hanquez [2005-07-13 10:32]: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:16:56AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > It seems that the nightly [1]snapshots still have the [2]2.6.11 sparse tree. > > Is this intended? I thought unstable branch switched over to 2.6.12 a > > few days ago? > > There's a problem with the nightly snapshot which contains an old > version of the tree. > > you can still update with mercurial for the moment. I was just doing that. I'd been using nightly snapshots exclusively since I didn't want to deal with the bk client stuff. > > > 2. > > % tar tzvf xen-unstable-src.tgz xen-unstable/linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse | wc -l > > 289 > > % tar tzvf xen-unstable-src.tgz xen-unstable/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse | wc -l > > 0 > > anyhow, the sparse tree has been renamed to linux-2.6-xen-sparse Good to know. Thanks. -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253 ryanh@us.ibm.com