From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: firewall ignore the rule Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:01:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20050714020155.GA26028@bender.817west.com> References: <2452665f0507130352544ab556@mail.gmail.com> <1121252895.11584.6.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> <2452665f05071318551f788f42@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2452665f05071318551f788f42@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:55:23AM +0800, liyas_m m wrote: > i have done that and checked with ethereal..still that source address > is not blocked. It is still broadcasting ARP packets..a lot. iptables/netfilter operates at layer 3. therefore, packets generated or received at layer 2 cannot be blocked with iptables/netfilter. ethereal/iptraf operate at the BPF layer (layer 2), and arp packets are layer 2 as well. iptables/netfilter is not at fault; you have an invalid testing methodology. -j -- "Peter: Brian, there's a message in my Alpha Bits. It says "OOOOOO". Brian: Peter, those are Cheerios." --Family Guy