From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10?
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:45:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050715084505.GD1772@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507140912.22532.mgross@linux.intel.com>
Hi!
> Why can't I expect SWSusp work better and more reliable from release to
> release?
Patches welcome. Or employ someone to do swsusp development for you.
> Some possible things that could help:
>
> *Addopt a no-regressions-allowed policy and everthing stops until any
> identified regressions (in performance, functionally or stability) is fixed
> or the changes are all rolled back. This works really well if in addition
> organized pre-flight testing is done before calling a new version number.
> You simply cannot rely on ad-hock regression testing and reporting. Its got
> too much latency.
This would also mean "no development at all".
> * assign validation folks that the developer need to appease before changes
> are allowed to be accepted into the tree.
So... get me someone to test swsusp in each -rc and -mm
release... that would help. If you can't provide the manpower, why are
you whining?
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-16 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 16:12 Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10? Mark Gross
2005-07-14 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-15 8:45 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
[not found] <200507140912.22532.mgross@linux.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-07-15 0:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 1:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-15 2:02 ` Chris Friesen
2005-07-15 2:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-15 2:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 21:33 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 2:16 ` Dave Airlie
2005-07-15 21:39 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 2:09 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-15 21:47 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 22:19 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-15 22:25 ` David Lang
2005-07-15 23:14 ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-18 21:14 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-19 10:12 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-07-15 2:09 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-07-15 2:14 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 13:32 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050715084505.GD1772@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.