From: Nicholas Hans Simmonds <nhstux@gmail.com>
To: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@transmeta.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Filesystem capabilities support
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:23:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050716142328.GA9125@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507142005.j6EK5Hhn030304@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:05:17PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Nicholas Hans Simmonds <nhstux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Other than this, what are the general thoughts about this method as
> > opposed to just using a well defined byte order?
>
> I'd prefer a defined byte order. That way it won't bite too hard if I
> happen to move a filesystem (image) from PC to SPARC or whatever.
> --
> Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
> Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
> Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
> Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
Fair enough. With inotify now in Linus' tree, my patch will conflict
so I've fixed this in the following new patch which also stores the
xattr data in big-endian format. I've tested it this time and it
seems to work. Also if anyone can think of a neater method of byte-
swapping the structure (some sort of string operation?) I'd be glad
to hear it as the current code looks a bit ugly.
Thanks as ever,
Nicholas
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/xattr.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -303,6 +304,16 @@ ssize_t vfs_write(struct file *file, con
else
ret = do_sync_write(file, buf, count, pos);
if (ret > 0) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ struct dentry *d = file->f_dentry;
+ if(d->d_inode->i_op && d->d_inode->i_op->
+ removexattr) {
+ down(&d->d_inode->i_sem);
+ d->d_inode->i_op->removexattr(d,
+ XATTR_CAP_SET);
+ up(&d->d_inode->i_sem);
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
fsnotify_modify(file->f_dentry);
current->wchar += ret;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -39,7 +39,19 @@ typedef struct __user_cap_data_struct {
__u32 permitted;
__u32 inheritable;
} __user *cap_user_data_t;
-
+
+struct cap_xattr_data {
+ __u32 version;
+ __u32 mask_effective;
+ __u32 effective;
+ __u32 mask_permitted;
+ __u32 permitted;
+ __u32 mask_inheritable;
+ __u32 inheritable;
+};
+
+#define XATTR_CAP_SET XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX "cap_set"
+
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -60,6 +60,13 @@ config SECURITY_CAPABILITIES
This enables the "default" Linux capabilities functionality.
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer Y.
+config SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ bool "Filesystem Capabilities (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ depends on SECURITY && EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ This permits a process' capabilities to be set by an extended
+ attribute in the security namespace (security.cap_set).
+
config SECURITY_ROOTPLUG
tristate "Root Plug Support"
depends on USB && SECURITY
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -111,9 +111,15 @@ void cap_capset_set (struct task_struct
int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ ssize_t (*bprm_getxattr)(struct dentry *,const char *,void *,size_t);
+ struct dentry *bprm_dentry;
+ ssize_t ret;
+ struct cap_xattr_data caps;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
+
/* Copied from fs/exec.c:prepare_binprm. */
- /* We don't have VFS support for capabilities yet */
cap_clear (bprm->cap_inheritable);
cap_clear (bprm->cap_permitted);
cap_clear (bprm->cap_effective);
@@ -134,6 +140,44 @@ int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_
if (bprm->e_uid == 0)
cap_set_full (bprm->cap_effective);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ /* Locate any VFS capabilities: */
+
+ bprm_dentry = bprm->file->f_dentry;
+ if(!(bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op &&
+ bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op->getxattr))
+ return 0;
+ bprm_getxattr = bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op->getxattr;
+
+ down(&bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+ ret = bprm_getxattr(bprm_dentry,XATTR_CAP_SET,&caps,sizeof(caps));
+ up(&bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+ if(ret == sizeof(caps)) {
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.version);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.effective);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_effective);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.permitted);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_permitted);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.inheritable);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_inheritable);
+ if(caps.version == _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION) {
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_effective) &= caps.mask_effective;
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_effective) |= caps.effective;
+
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_permitted) &= caps.mask_permitted;
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_permitted) |= caps.permitted;
+
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_inheritable) &= caps.mask_inheritable;
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_inheritable) |= caps.inheritable;
+ } else
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: %s capability set has "
+ "incorrect version %08X. Correct version "
+ "is %08X.\n",bprm->filename,caps.version,
+ _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION);
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-15 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-02 21:41 [PATCH] Filesystem capabilities support Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-02 23:01 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-07-03 0:14 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-06 4:56 ` Nathan Scott
2005-07-04 14:27 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-13 6:29 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-13 17:51 ` Horst von Brand
2005-07-14 4:29 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-14 20:05 ` Horst von Brand
2005-07-16 14:23 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds [this message]
2005-07-15 3:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-16 15:42 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-24 13:36 Arnout Engelen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050716142328.GA9125@laptop \
--to=nhstux@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@transmeta.com \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.