All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc3a] i386: inline restore_fpu
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:14:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050722081417.GJ3160@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507212309_MC3-1-A534-95EF@compuserve.com>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:06:22PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> 
>   This patch makes restore_fpu() an inline.  When L1/L2 cache are saturated
> it makes a measurable difference.
> 
>   Results from profiling Volanomark follow.  Sample rate was 2000 samples/sec
> (HZ = 250, profile multiplier = 8) on a dual-processor Pentium II Xeon.
> 
> 
> Before:
> 
>  10680 restore_fpu                              333.7500
>   8351 device_not_available                     203.6829
>   3823 math_state_restore                        59.7344
>  -----
>  22854
> 
> 
> After:
> 
>  12534 math_state_restore                       130.5625
>   8354 device_not_available                     203.7561
>  -----
>  20888
> 
> 
> Patch is "obviously correct" and cuts 9% of the overhead.  Please apply.
>...

If this patch makes a difference, could you do me a favour and check 
whether replacing the current cpu_has_fxsr #define in
include/asm-i386/cpufeature.h with

  #define cpu_has_fxsr           1

on top of your patch brings an additional improvement?

> Chuck

TIA
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-22  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-22  3:06 [patch 2.6.13-rc3a] i386: inline restore_fpu Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-22  3:27 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-22  5:22   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-22 11:23     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-07-22  8:14 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-07-22 18:13   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-25 19:26     ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-22 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-22  9:58 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-23  7:09 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-23 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23 17:46   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-07-23 18:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23  7:09 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-23 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found] <200507212309_MC3-1-A534-95EF@compuserve.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20050722132756.578acca7.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-07-23 15:35   ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-24 12:56 Kenneth Parrish
2005-07-25  2:34 Kenneth Parrish
2005-07-26 21:23 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-26 21:23 Chuck Ebbert
2005-07-26 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-27  1:40 linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050722081417.GJ3160@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.