All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: hugang@soulinfo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Pallipadi,
	Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Bernard Blackham <b-lkml@blackham.com.au>,
	Christian Hesse <mail@earthworm.de>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050610-1
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:11:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050725101157.GF5837@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1121781115.14393.59.camel@gaston>

* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> [050719 06:55]:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:51 +0800, hugang@soulinfo.com wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 04:30:32PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I'm try to port it powerpc, Here is a patch.
> > > > 
> > > >  Port Dynamic Tick Timer to new platform is easy. :)
> > > >   1) Find the reprogram timer interface.
> > > >   2) do a hook in the idle function.
> > > > 
> > > > That worked on my PowerBookG4 12'.
> > > 
> > > Did you get a measurable gain on power consumption ?
> > > 
> > > Last time I toyed with this, I didn't.
> > 
> > Today I do a measurable about it. 
> > 
> > First I using 2.6.12 without dynamic enable and unplug the AC power,
> > I check the /proc/pmu/battery_0, like this.
> > --
> >  flags      : 00000011
> >  charge     : 907
> >  max_charge : 2863
> >  current    : -987
> >  voltage    : 10950
> >  time rem.  : 3600
> > --
> > I only intresting with current, that show the system power load. 
> > 
> > When I enable dynamic, The current can low at -900.
> 
> The numbers are repeatable ? I mean, if you actually let it settle down
> in both cases ? Also, you should be careful about "parasites" in the
> measurement, like pbbuttons dimming the backlight, the hard disk going
> to sleep etc...
> 
> >From your numbers you get something like 10% improvement, which isn't
> too bad.

Just quick update here, I'm back from vacation and will try to
post updated dyn-tick patch soon with the PPC patch integrated.

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-25 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-02  1:36 [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1 Tony Lindgren
2005-06-02  1:54 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-06-02  2:09   ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-02  8:30 ` Christian Hesse
2005-06-02 17:42   ` [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-2 Tony Lindgren
2005-06-02 20:03     ` Christian Hesse
2005-06-02 20:32       ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-03  6:08         ` Christian Hesse
2005-06-03 17:39           ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-04 12:51             ` Christian Hesse
2005-06-10  4:03               ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-05  4:06       ` Bernard Blackham
2005-06-10  4:05         ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-03 22:37     ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-03 22:47       ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-10  4:17       ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-10  9:15         ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-10 15:17           ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-10 22:15             ` [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050610-1 Tony Lindgren
2005-06-18  3:34               ` hugang
2005-06-18  6:30                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-21  1:28                   ` Tony Lindgren
2005-06-21  1:49                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-21  2:21                       ` Tony Lindgren
2005-07-19  6:51                   ` hugang
2005-07-19 13:51                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-07-25 10:11                       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2005-06-11 17:59           ` [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-2 Kyle Moffett
2005-06-07 20:36 ` [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-1 Jonathan Corbet
2005-06-10  4:18   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050725101157.GF5837@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=b-lkml@blackham.com.au \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hugang@soulinfo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@earthworm.de \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.