From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: execve() in reboot.c ? Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:20:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20050725182023.GA29713@snarc.org> References: <200507251847.56337.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> <1122314192.2608.20.camel@bree.local.net> <200507251903.59053.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Rik van Riel Cc: Jeremy Katz , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Mark Williamson , Ian Pratt List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:13:25PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Mark Williamson wrote: > > > It'd be nice if Linux had a generic way of communicating a reboot > > request to userspace. It ought to be useful on other VMMs - maybe this > > is something for Rik's common infrastructure wishlist? > > How about simply reusing whatever signal is sent to init > when ctrl-alt-del is pressed on PCs ? SIGINT That's not a good idea though, if somebody put nothing in the ctrlaltdel action, then it's not going to do anything. -- Vincent Hanquez