From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Subject: Re: What happened to mkiss module Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:38:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20050725203842.GJ2814@linux-mips.org> References: <000c01c59018$a50ec2b0$a4011fac@kb2ear1> <20050724084523.GA3130@linux-mips.org> <000801c590cd$3f3572d0$a4011fac@kb2ear1> <20050725133658.GB2814@linux-mips.org> <007301c5914b$0a226c50$a4011fac@kb2ear1> <20050725193914.GH2814@linux-mips.org> <000e01c59154$3f29c6b0$a4011fac@kb2ear1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000e01c59154$3f29c6b0$a4011fac@kb2ear1> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Scott Weis Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:05:46PM -0400, Scott Weis wrote: > I grabbed the message directly off of the server with VI. I only had one > rej.. Okay. That's more the expected behaviour due to the change in 2.6.12-rc4. > I applied the last part of the patch by hand.. No problems.. I found > references to the SIOCSIFHWADDR: Invalid argument problem on the web and it > seems to be a problem with the ax25 module not being seen. So I was > thinking that perhaps there is something missing from the /dev? > > Should I have any udev config entries?? No. That should result in a different error message. 73 de DL5RB op Ralf -- Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21