From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dz9DZ-0005Da-GZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:30:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dz9DX-0005C1-BT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:30:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dz9DV-00053n-IK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:30:42 -0400 Received: from [66.54.152.27] (helo=jive.SoftHome.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dz9AO-0000TP-Es for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:27:28 -0400 From: Mulyadi Santosa Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:08:50 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507311508.50882.a_mulyadi@softhome.net> Subject: [Qemu-devel] FC2 guest is working slower than RH9 on FC2 host Reply-To: a_mulyadi@softhome.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello everybody Yesterday I tried to install Fedora Core 2 guest using qemu 0.7.1 (no kqemu) on top of FC 2 host. Both guest and host are running 2.6.5-1.358 (the default kernel of FC2). I experienced slower boot speed and slower keyboard typing (the delay between a key a pressed and the actual character is showed). Couple weeks ago I installed RH9 as guest also on top of FC2 host but the speed is better. Is it because the guest kernel (FC2) using HZ=1000 so qemu has problem on syncing the clock? or are there any technical explanations on why it happens? My PC spec: AMD Athlon XP 1800+ RAM 256 MB DDR Hard disk 80 GB EIDE GeForce 2 MX 440 (X display is using nvidia driver) regards Mulyadi