From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1DzGmL-0005Vu-MK for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:35:09 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzGm8-0005Om-CB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:34:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzGm0-0005J8-Fx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:34:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzGly-0005ED-33 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:34:46 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DzGjk-0005Oe-TK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:32:29 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B705FF51E23 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 31 Jul 05 16:20:07 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:19:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42B36238.8040204@inma.ucl.ac.be> <87oe968xnx.fsf@student.han.nl> <42EB7E95.4040709@list.ru> In-Reply-To: <42EB7E95.4040709@list.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507311819.24663.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: Bug-fixing and keystroke X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:35:00 -0000 On Saturday 30 July 2005 15:20, Serbinenko Vladimir wrote: > I wrote some bugfixing patch + new feature. Thank you very much. I have applied only the bugfixes at the moment. > The new feature is sending keystroke to OS (imitating keypress + > changing keyboard flags). > it works like: > keystroke [flags] [keys] This is specific to i386-pc, so the source file should be put in commands/i386/pc. I'm also wondering if this command name is good or not. In QEMU, the same feature is called "sendkey". I'm not sure which is better. Another question I have is that it might be better to implement this as a variable rather than a command. Basically, this command just stores information rathen than executing something directly. So using a variable sounds intuitive for me. What do you think? Okuji