From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262215AbVHCKjL (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:39:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262207AbVHCKjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:39:09 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:20897 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262215AbVHCKhu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 06:37:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:37:44 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: David Teigland , Arjan van de Ven Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cluster@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS Message-ID: <20050803103744.GG11081@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20050802071828.GA11217@redhat.com> <1122968724.3247.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050803035618.GB9812@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050803035618.GB9812@redhat.com> X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2005-08-03T11:56:18, David Teigland wrote: > > * Why use your own journalling layer and not say ... jbd ? > Here's an analysis of three approaches to cluster-fs journaling and their > pros/cons (including using jbd): http://tinyurl.com/7sbqq Very instructive read, thanks for the link. -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"