All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:38:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050804203831.GD4029@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050804065447.GB25606@lug-owl.de>

On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:54:47AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>...
> Current GCC from CVS (plus minor configury patches) seems to work. We
> had -fno-unit-at-a-time missing in our arch Makefile which hides a bug
> in kernel's sources.
> 
> I guess that if you remove -fno-unit-at-a-time from i386 and use a
> current GCC, you'll run into that fun, too.

What bug exactly?

I'm sometimes using kernels compiled with gcc 4.0 and without 
-fno-unit-at-a-time and except for the kernel image being smaller I 
haven't noticed any difference. Besides this, all architectures except 
i386 and um are not disabling unit-at-a-time.

There are a few parts of the kernel that might still have stack problems 
with unit-at-a-time, but I assume that's not what you are talking about?

> MfG, JBG
>...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-04 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-31 22:26 [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-31 22:36 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-31 23:08   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-08-07 16:25   ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-08-10 19:40   ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-11  0:02     ` Joe
2005-08-11  0:05       ` David S. Miller
2005-08-13  3:27       ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-01  3:01 ` [2.6 patch] " Kurt Wall
2005-08-02  5:37   ` Willy Tarreau
2005-08-01  4:27 ` Miles Bader
2005-08-02 21:46 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-03  2:08 ` Gustavo Guillermo Pérez
2005-08-04  0:53   ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2005-08-04 20:34     ` networking problems when using gcc 4.0.1 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-04  1:34 ` [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2 Dave Airlie
2005-08-04  6:54   ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-04 20:38     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-08-05 21:14       ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-05 21:30         ` Martin Drab
2005-08-05 21:37           ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-13  9:21       ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-12  7:40     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-08-12 10:40       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-08-12 12:29       ` Jan-Benedict Glaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050804203831.GD4029@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.