From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1E0rnK-0006i7-Jw for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:18:46 -0700 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6] helo=lakshmi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1E0rnJ-0002zx-5N for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:18:46 -0700 From: Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Host kernel requirements for UML (fwd) Message-ID: <20050805011850.GA12633@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:18:50 -0400 To: Adam Heath Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:32:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > Wouldn't it make more sense to actually test for those instructions instead of > parsing proc, for use on systems without a linux compatible /proc. Yes, it would, and the code would probably be simpler. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel