All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: John B?ckstrand <sandos@home.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:12:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805201215.GG7425@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73ek987gjw.fsf@bragg.suse.de>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 01:45:55PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> John B?ckstrand <sandos@home.se> writes:
> 
> > I've been trying to hunt down a hard lockup issue with some hardware
> > of mine, but I've possibly hit a kernel bug instead. When using
> > netconsole on my e1000, if I unplug the cable and then re-plug it, the
> > machine locks up hard. It manages to print the "link up" message on
> > the screen, but nothing after that. Now, I wonder if this is supposed
> > to be so? I tried this on 4 different configurations, 2.6.13-rc5 and
> > 2.6.12 with and without "noapic acpi=off", same result on all of
> > them. I've tried with 1 and 3 other NICs in the machine at the same
> > time.
> 
> I ran into the same problem some time ago on e1000. The problem was
> that if the link doesn't come up netconsole ends up waiting forever
> for it.

I still don't like this fix. Yes, you're right, it should eventually
give up. But here it gives up way too easily - 5 could easily
translate to 5 microseconds. This is analogous to giving up on serial
transmit if CTS is down for 5 loops.

I'd be much happier if there were some udelay or the like in here so
that we're not giving up on such a short timeframe.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <42F347D2.7000207@home.se.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-05 11:45 ` lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 12:44   ` John Bäckstrand
2005-08-05 13:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 13:55     ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 14:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:14         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 14:27           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:36             ` David S. Miller
2005-08-05 15:02               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:36           ` [PATCH] netpoll can lock up on low memory Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 20:01             ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 20:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 21:28                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  0:23                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  1:53                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  2:32                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  7:30                         ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-06  7:58                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-06 23:10                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  9:46                         ` David S. Miller
2005-08-06  9:57                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06 12:09                             ` John Bäckstrand
2005-08-07  5:40                             ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:26               ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 21:42                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:51                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-06  1:16                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  0:30                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  7:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-06 11:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-07 21:12     ` lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion John Bäckstrand
2005-08-08  2:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 20:12   ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2005-08-05 21:56     ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 23:20       ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 23:51         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-06  1:22           ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  1:37             ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-05 11:04 John Bäckstrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050805201215.GG7425@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandos@home.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.