From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2HIo-00032k-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:45:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2HIl-00031o-TP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2HIl-00031l-K9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:45:03 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.11] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1E2HSE-0004sg-KV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:54:50 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] new kqemu win98 hack affects FreeBSD Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:40:09 +0100 References: <20050808225748.GA86305@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050808225748.GA86305@saturn.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508090040.11554.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock > > So maybe we need a new switch -win98-hack... :) It's spelt -no-kqemu :-) Paul