From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1E2Np3-0007Ah-5Z for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 02:42:49 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2Noz-00079m-1e for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 02:42:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2Nn2-0006ji-Jy for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 02:40:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2Nn0-0006gO-GQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 02:40:42 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E2Nxj-0001yL-VY for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 02:51:48 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB725FFC1FE0 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:37:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 9 Aug 05 06:37:28 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:36:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200508061704.47518.okuji@enbug.org> <200508071615.08363.okuji@enbug.org> <857725666e3cacec7ab10a6f1d4c690d@penguinppc.org> In-Reply-To: <857725666e3cacec7ab10a6f1d4c690d@penguinppc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508090836.30891.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: arch-specific files X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 06:42:46 -0000 On Tuesday 09 August 2005 05:37, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Since "of" is a very common English word, it is not a good file or > variable name. We have standardized on the full "ieee1275" for both, so > I have renamed this file. OK. That makes sense. Just a question: why do we still use "of" in some places then? Like ofconsole.c. Why isn't it just console.c? Okuji