From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: cpufreq suspend patch. Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:25:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20050809162556.GK5844@redhat.com> References: <20050808224401.GA3277@redhat.com> <1123576360.30257.153.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1123576360.30257.153.camel@gaston> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, dwmw2@redhat.com On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Ben Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 18:44 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Ben, > > Dave Woodhouse added this to the Fedora kernel a while back > > with the helpful comment "Fix ppc32 sleep/cpufreq harder" > > I believe this came from you originally. > > > > Can you comment on this ? > > > > It seems to make sense to me, but if you have a newer patch > > I'm all ears.. > > Can you compare with what's currently upstream ? (I'm still travelling > around so it's more difficult for me). Gah, I've been bitten by the 'in Fedora cvs, but not applied to spec file' thing again. A variant of this is already upstream. Thanks. Dave