From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1E2ZD3-000336-DL for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:52:21 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2ZCy-0002zv-JA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:52:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2ZCw-0002xj-0g for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:52:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2ZCv-0002wV-P2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:52:13 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E2ZM8-0005tH-2Y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:01:44 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40603FFC1FE0 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 9 Aug 05 18:47:16 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:46:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200508082229.56748.okuji@enbug.org> <200508091437.16103.okuji@enbug.org> <87ek93qmb3.fsf@student.han.nl> In-Reply-To: <87ek93qmb3.fsf@student.han.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508092046.22045.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: savannah X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:52:18 -0000 On Tuesday 09 August 2005 15:20, Marco Gerards wrote: > Someone told me that this is not a correct approach. The correct one > is being able to fall back to the other mirror disk when the first > disk can not be read. I don't know if this is important or not, I > don't know much about RAID. It is better to be able to fallback to a working disk, surely. But the importance is not high, because, at least on PC, the firmware cannot fallback. > My interest is to make GRUB Legacy obsolete and get more contributors > and testers. I agree. If you know how to get more developers, please enlighten me. Okuji