From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat Double Subject: Re: reiser4 performance Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:49:51 -0500 Message-ID: <200508092149.51707.pat@patdouble.com> References: <200508092119.13103.pat@patdouble.com> <42F96737.7050809@slaphack.com> Reply-To: pat@patdouble.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42F96737.7050809@slaphack.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David Masover Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Tuesday 09 August 2005 09:32 pm, David Masover wrote: > Pat Double wrote: > > Actually I did make it public, hit the wrong command on my mail client ;) > > > > I did not try the -mm kernel (latest patches is for -mm5 IIRC), I use > > software suspend 2 and it does not apply to the 2.6.12.x-mm series. > > Except for this problem reiser4 has worked great for me. Since I use a > > single partition and '/' does not get modified much I copied all my data > > over, rebuilt the filesystem, and then started using it. I have not > > discovered any problems, and the filesystem is quite fast. > > That's with the mm reiser4, or the reiser4-for-2.6? > > Glad to hear it works with Suspend2. That's going to be the next thing > I try, once my system is back up to speed. I'm on Gentoo, so > understandably it takes awhile to get back up to speed, Godlike amd64 > speeds notwithstanding. I used the reiser4-for-2.6 patches. Before the 2.6.12 patches were available I tried the -mm patches from reiser4-for-2.6 which applied cleanly. When 2.6.12 recently I tried those with the same results. I did not try the -mm kernel sources because even if they worked flawlessly it would be no help to me. Suspend 2 is more important to me than reiser4. Shutdown in 30 seconds, startup in 30 seconds is more useful to me. -- Pat Double, pat@patdouble.com "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."