From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751044AbVHKFk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:40:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751043AbVHKFk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:40:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:53126 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbVHKFkz (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:40:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:40:45 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: zach@vmware.com, akpm@osdl.org, chrisl@vmware.com, chrisw@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, mbligh@mbligh.org, pratap@vmware.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor Message-ID: <20050811054045.GU7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <200508110456.j7B4ue56019587@zach-dev.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@arm.linux.org.uk) wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 zach@vmware.com wrote: > > > Add an accessor function for getting the per-CPU gdt. Callee must already > > have the CPU. > > This one seems superfluous to me, does accessing it indirectly generate > better code too? It's prepratory for other work. thanks, -chris