All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20050812080210.58573fe3.khali@linux-fr.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index c67aafe..1faa8dd 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ possibly take a look at the i2c-viapro driver and comment on that part:
 	if ((pci_read_config_word(pdev, id->driver_data, &vt596_smba)) ||
 	    !(vt596_smba & 0x1)) {
 		/* try 2nd address and config reg. for 596 */
-		if (id->device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596_3 &&
+		if (id->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596_3 &&
 		    !pci_read_config_word(pdev, SMBBA2, &vt596_smba) &&
 		    (vt596_smba & 0x1)) {
 			smb_cf_hstcfg = 0x84;
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ Alright, it matches the datasheet and my expectations.
 > the i2c-viapro is a polling driver, it becomes slower as HZ decreases.
 
 Absolutely true. This is what improved the speed of most SMBus drivers
-in 2.6 when compared with 2.4: HZ\x1000. Now we're stepping back a bit
-with HZ%0.
+in 2.6 when compared with 2.4: HZ=1000. Now we're stepping back a bit
+with HZ=250.
 
 > I.e. the improvement you are seeing with byte vs. block xfers is quite
 > exaggerated because we poll the device relatively infrequently.  *All*
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index cadaacb..e29eb07 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
  "ref\020050809231328.0726537b.khali@linux-fr.org\0"
  "ref\020050812010759.GA11361@jupiter.solarsys.private\0"
- "From\0khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)\0"
- "Subject\0[lm-sensors] I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted\0"
- "Date\0Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:02:09 +0000\0"
+ "From\0Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted\0"
+ "Date\0Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:02:10 +0200\0"
  "To\0Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>\0"
  "Cc\0LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>"
  " LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
  "\tif ((pci_read_config_word(pdev, id->driver_data, &vt596_smba)) ||\n"
  "\t    !(vt596_smba & 0x1)) {\n"
  "\t\t/* try 2nd address and config reg. for 596 */\n"
- "\t\tif (id->device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596_3 &&\n"
+ "\t\tif (id->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596_3 &&\n"
  "\t\t    !pci_read_config_word(pdev, SMBBA2, &vt596_smba) &&\n"
  "\t\t    (vt596_smba & 0x1)) {\n"
  "\t\t\tsmb_cf_hstcfg = 0x84;\n"
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
  "> the i2c-viapro is a polling driver, it becomes slower as HZ decreases.\n"
  "\n"
  "Absolutely true. This is what improved the speed of most SMBus drivers\n"
- "in 2.6 when compared with 2.4: HZ\02000. Now we're stepping back a bit\n"
- "with HZ%0.\n"
+ "in 2.6 when compared with 2.4: HZ=1000. Now we're stepping back a bit\n"
+ "with HZ=250.\n"
  "\n"
  "> I.e. the improvement you are seeing with byte vs. block xfers is quite\n"
  "> exaggerated because we poll the device relatively infrequently.  *All*\n"
@@ -81,4 +81,4 @@
  "-- \n"
  Jean Delvare
 
-b57fa5c5c7cfd4f6bfbd140e4825df3cd60547600916e37230038dd3a4d325b5
+685448d1b77452df64d80343a212b74fcc1df06e59f6950a982ea1a7b30f26a1

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.