From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1E4Ru0-00040u-Ae for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:28:28 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E4Rtr-0003vj-6Q for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:28:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E4Rtm-0003rh-2Y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:28:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4Rtj-0003k0-Hr for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:28:11 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E4RrU-0002XV-VB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:25:53 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A859FF65C04 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:10:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 14 Aug 05 23:10:13 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:09:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42FF0C53.1070601@gmail.com> <200508141712.06190.okuji@enbug.org> <20050814225411.GA4037@pell.home.ka8zrt.com> In-Reply-To: <20050814225411.GA4037@pell.home.ka8zrt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508150109.07314.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Scripts and menus X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:28:23 -0000 On Monday 15 August 2005 00:54, Douglas Wade Needham wrote: > I agree that we should not continue to think about improvements, etc. > However, if we are talking alpha/beta/rc stages, then we should be > talking about a release branch, into which we only put controlled > changes. Otherwise, we will not get the stability during testing, and > the end result will likely be far from what we want, either in time or > in quality. Don't worry. We do not need to make a stable version for a while. Now is too early to talk about branching in GRUB 2. Okuji