From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1E4aYs-0002wh-6W for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:43:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E4aYp-0002v7-06 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:43:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E4aYm-0002te-2y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:43:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4aYl-0002sm-Ng for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:43:07 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E4ajn-00069W-N6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:54:31 -0400 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DA5FF96FCB for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=ip6-localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 15 Aug 05 08:38:47 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:37:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42FF0C53.1070601@gmail.com> <20050814225411.GA4037@pell.home.ka8zrt.com> <1E4ZNR-0eBtCK0@fwd16.aul.t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <1E4ZNR-0eBtCK0@fwd16.aul.t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508151037.36745.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Grub2 Improvements X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:43:12 -0000 On Monday 15 August 2005 09:27, marm.mm@t-online.de wrote: > I would agree with this. We should have a stable basis on which we can > improve grub2. There are so many improvments, e.g. vesafb module and > many others, and later a graphical menu, but we dont have a structure > for a menu entry (or a stable). Other modules/improvement uses this > basis and when this basis changes, parts of grub2/modules must be > rewritten to fit to the basis. We should create a list of improvments > (all the improvments which occurs in the list) and set priorities. We > should cralify which improvements apear in the next release and which > not, ... Do not use "we should", when "we" do not include yourself. I do not like your idea. I have already said that we do not need branching at the moment. If you need stability, use GRUB Legacy. That's it. Okuji