From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751267AbVHQVYL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751290AbVHQVYL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:24:11 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:9653 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267AbVHQVYK (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:24:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050817.142402.43344792.davem@davemloft.net> To: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] IPV4 long lasting timer function From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1124312341.23647.277.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> References: <1124312341.23647.277.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:59:01 +0200 > Shouldn't this be converted to a workqueue, which gets triggered by a > timer instead of blocking the timer softirq and therefor the delivery of > other timer functions that long ? We could, and I'd be happy to apply such a patch if someone writes it up.