From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Mathias Kretschmer <posting@blx4.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VIA VT6410 IDE support for 2.6.11-rc3/via82cxxx
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:16:00 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050817131600.GE11523@procyon.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58cb370e0502111033677d9a2d@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1628 bytes --]
(sending this again, because did not see the message in linux-kernel
for 2 days and suspect that it has been lost; sorry if someone
receives a duplicate)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 07:33:59PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:27:47 -0500, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
> > > Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
> > >> Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
> > >>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >>>> Mathias Kretschmer wrote:
> > >>>>> hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I found an older version of this patch (against 2.4.22) on some
> > >>>>> website. After a little bit of editing it applied cleanly to 2.4.27
> > >>>>> (and now 2.4.28). It works fine for me on a ASUS P4P800-Deluxe with
> > >>>>> 4x 300GB disks.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Maybe someone finds this patch helpful. Any reason why the original
> > >>>>> patch did not make it into the kernel ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Why not add it to the existing via82cxxx driver, and get better
> > >>>> performance and device tuning?
> > >>
> > >> OK, the attached patch adds support for the VIA 6410 chip to the
> > >> via82cxxx driver (instead of the generic driver).
> > >> I've tested it on the board mentioned above. Works fine for me.
> > >
> > > as above, but for 2.6.11-rc3
> >
> > Bart, got this one?
>
> I applied it (after whitespace cleanup) to ide-dev-2.6.
Sorry to bother you, but what's the status of this patch? Since that
time, 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 kernels were released, now 2.6.13 is almost
ready, and the VT6410 support does not seem to appear even in -mm.
Has the patch been lost, or is it broken?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-23 7:23 VIA VT610 IDE support for 2.4.28 (trivial) Mathias Kretschmer
2004-11-23 18:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-23 20:48 ` Mathias Kretschmer
2005-02-06 23:02 ` VIA VT610 IDE support for 2.4.28 (trivial) - now for 2.4.29/via82cxxx Mathias Kretschmer
2005-02-07 17:16 ` VIA VT6410 IDE support for 2.6.11-rc3/via82cxxx Mathias Kretschmer
2005-02-07 17:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-11 18:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-15 11:50 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-08-17 13:16 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050817131600.GE11523@procyon.home \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=posting@blx4.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.