From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (caramon.arm.linux.org.uk [212.18.232.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D3667F91 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:46:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:46:00 +0100 From: Russell King To: David Woodhouse Message-ID: <20050817174600.A22040@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1124209292.3869.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050817121128.A19990@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1124296771.3869.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1124296771.3869.74.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100 Sender: Russell King Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:11 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > Doesn't PPC64 have NO_IRQ ? > > PPC64 does but I find no definition of is_real_interrupt() other than > the bogus one in 8250.c which checks for zero. PPC32 does not -- let's > clean that one up separately. Ok. I'll give you this line now for this patch: Acked-by: Russell King so you're free to push it upstream whenever you deem is the right time. Thanks. -- Russell King