From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
OpenLDAP-devel@openldap.org, Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>,
Simone Zinanni <simone@develer.com>
Subject: Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:47:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508181047.26008.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4303DB48.8010902@develer.com>
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:50 am, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been investigating a performance problem on a
> server using OpenLDAP 2.2.26 for nss resolution and
> running kernel 2.6.12.
>
> When a CPU bound process such as GCC is running in the
> background (even at nice 10), many trivial commands such
> as "su" or "groups" become extremely slow and take a few
> seconds to complete.
>
> strace revealed that data exchange over the slapd socket
> was where most of the time was spent. Looking at the
> slapd side, I see several calls to sched_yield() like this:
>
>
> [pid 8780] 0.000033 stat64("gidNumber.dbb", 0xb7b3ebcc) = -1 EACCES
> (Permission denied) [pid 8780] 0.000059 pread(20,
> "\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\344\17\2\3"..., 4096, 4096) =
> 4096 [pid 8780] 0.000083 pread(20,
> "\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\222\0<\7\1\5\370"..., 4096,
> 16384) = 4096 [pid 8780] 0.000078 time(NULL) = 1124322520
> [pid 8780] 0.000066 pread(11,
> "\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\250\0\0\0\231\0\0\0\235\0\0\0\16\0000"..., 4096, 688128)
> = 4096 [pid 8780] 0.000241 write(19,
> "0e\2\1\3d`\4$cn=bernie,ou=group,dc=d"..., 103) = 103 [pid 8780]
> 0.000137 sched_yield( <unfinished ...>
> [pid 8781] 0.050020 <... sched_yield resumed> ) = 0
> [pid 8780] 0.000025 <... sched_yield resumed> ) = 0
> [pid 8781] 0.000060 futex(0x925ab20, FUTEX_WAIT, 33, NULL <unfinished
> ...> [pid 8780] 0.000026 write(19, "0\f\2\1\3e\7\n\1\0\4\0\4\0", 14)
> = 14 [pid 8774] 0.000774 <... select resumed> ) = 1 (in [19])
>
>
> The relative timestamp reveals that slapd is spending 50ms
> after yielding. Meanwhile, GCC is probably being scheduled
> for a whole quantum.
>
> Reading the man-page of sched_yield() it seems this isn't
> the correct behavior:
>
> Note: If the current process is the only process in the
> highest priority list at that time, this process will
> continue to run after a call to sched_yield.
>
> I also think OpenLDAP is wrong. First, it should be calling
> pthread_yield() because slapd is a multithreading process
> and it just wants to run the other threads. See:
sched_yield behaviour changed in 2.5 series more than 3 years ago and
applications that use this as a locking primitive should be updated.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-18 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-18 0:50 sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow Bernardo Innocenti
2005-08-18 0:47 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-08-18 10:48 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2005-08-18 1:07 ` Joseph Fannin
2005-08-18 2:25 ` Bernardo Innocenti
2005-08-18 2:58 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-19 3:10 ` Bernardo Innocenti
[not found] <4303DB48.8010902@develer.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20050818010703.GA13127@nineveh.rivenstone.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <4303F967.6000404@yahoo.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <43054D9A.7090509@develer.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-19 3:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-19 3:30 ` Bernardo Innocenti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-19 6:03 Howard Chu
2005-08-19 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-19 6:59 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-19 22:45 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-19 10:21 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-08-19 23:10 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 13:23 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-08-20 19:49 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 22:08 ` Nikita Danilov
[not found] <4D8eT-4rg-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-08-20 3:20 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-20 4:18 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-20 18:38 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 20:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 21:24 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-21 0:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-21 11:33 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-08-22 8:06 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-20 21:50 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-21 1:04 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-22 11:44 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-22 14:26 ` Robert Hancock
2005-08-23 11:17 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-23 12:07 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-08-24 3:37 ` Lincoln Dale
[not found] <43057641.70700@symas.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <17157.45712.877795.437505@gargle.gargle.HOWL.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <430666DB.70802@symas.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-20 13:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-21 19:47 ` Florian Weimer
2005-08-22 5:09 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-22 13:06 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-22 18:47 ` Howard Chu
2005-08-22 13:20 ` Florian Weimer
2005-08-22 23:19 ` Howard Chu
2006-01-14 19:29 Howard Chu
[not found] <5uZqb-4fo-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-14 22:47 ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-24 22:59 e100 oops on resume Stefan Seyfried
2006-01-24 23:21 ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-25 9:02 ` Olaf Kirch
2006-01-25 12:11 ` Olaf Kirch
2006-01-25 13:51 ` sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow Howard Chu
2006-01-25 14:38 ` Robert Hancock
2006-01-25 17:49 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-01-26 1:07 ` David Schwartz
2006-01-26 8:30 ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-26 9:01 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-26 10:50 ` Nikita Danilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508181047.26008.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=OpenLDAP-devel@openldap.org \
--cc=bernie@develer.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rasky@develer.com \
--cc=simone@develer.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.