From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932456AbVHRVYP (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:24:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932458AbVHRVYP (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:24:15 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:34522 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932456AbVHRVYO (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:24:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:23:48 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh To: David Teigland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-cluster@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dlm: use configfs Message-ID: <20050818212348.GW21228@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh References: <20050818060750.GA10133@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050818060750.GA10133@redhat.com> Organization: Oracle Corporation User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:07:50PM +0800, David Teigland wrote: > +/* > + * /config/dlm//spaces//nodes//nodeid > + * /config/dlm//spaces//nodes//weight > + * /config/dlm//comms//nodeid > + * /config/dlm//comms//local > + * /config/dlm//comms//addr > + * The level is useless, but I haven't figured out how to avoid it. > + */ So what happened to factoring out the common parts of ocfs2_nodemanager? I was quite a big fan of that approach :) Or am I just misunderstanding what these patches do? --Mark -- Mark Fasheh Senior Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com