From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>
Subject: Re: building a iptables-firewallcluster
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:42:41 +0200
Message-ID: <200508221642.41805@nienna>
References: <20050802120309.GA5501@256bit.org> <200508221350.48867@nienna>
	<200508220815.45545.rob0@gmx.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <200508220815.45545.rob0@gmx.co.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org


  Hi,

On Monday 22 August 2005 15.15, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >   Almost, but not completely dead.
>
> Did we not just have 2 iptables releases last month? Slow perhaps,
> but the rumours of the death of netfilter would appear to be greatly
> exaggerated. :)

  I was referring to netfiler HA, not netfilter itself.

-- 
 Regards,
  Krisztian Kovacs