From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [RFC] Genapic in x86_64 Dom0 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:20:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20050822182036.GV7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Chris Wright , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org * Keir Fraser (Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk) wrote: > Perhaps genapic_xen is currently being too smart for its own good? :-) Hehe, quite possible ;-) > On i386 we lobotomised local apic handling. My goal was to avoid (equivalent of) #if 0 where possible, by backfilling functionality where possible. I also had filled out mpc_config_processor during mp_register_lapic and tried to maintain the physid map (that bit isn't merged). Do you think there's value in maintaining that level of code compatibility? thanks, -chris