From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: x86_64 DOM0 SMP oops Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:20:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20050822192029.GA7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050822185220.GH5523@us.ibm.com> <20050822191254.GM7901@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20050822191500.GI5523@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050822191500.GI5523@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ryan Harper Cc: Chris Wright , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org * Ryan Harper (ryanh@us.ibm.com) wrote: > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c RIP: > > > {retint_kernel+0} > > > PGD aae067 PUD aaf067 PMD 0 > > > Oops: 0000 [1] PREEMPT SMP > > > > Not surprising, w/ PREEMPT. Is it stable w/out PREEMPT? > > Really? I thought CONFIG_PREEMPT was tested since it was on for x86_32 > SMP. No, I expect it to be broken (and you seem to be able to easily prove that ;-) > I'll give that a shot and let you know. Great, thanks, -chris