From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932358AbVHWAnL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:43:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932374AbVHWAnL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:43:11 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:30627 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932358AbVHWAnK (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:43:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:57:48 -0500 From: serue@us.ibm.com To: Chris Wright Cc: Adrian Bunk , serue@us.ibm.com, lkml , linux-security-module@wirex.com, Andrew Morton , Stephen Smalley , James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security Message-ID: <20050822195748.GA9372@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20050822080401.GA26125@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20050822082028.GB25390@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20050822165209.GB5511@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20050822231111.GM9927@stusta.de> <20050822231419.GD7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050822231419.GD7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Chris Wright (chrisw@osdl.org): > * Adrian Bunk (bunk@stusta.de) wrote: > > You want to build these modules always and always modular? > > > > No matter whether the security subsystem is built modular or static? > > > > No matter whether the user has enabled or completely disabled the > > security subsystem? > > The modules are just for testing, and shouldn't be added at all. Right, in no way should the testing modules be upstreamed :) thanks, -serge