From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932107AbVHWOme (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:42:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932172AbVHWOme (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:42:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52418 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932107AbVHWOme (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:42:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:42:30 -0400 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] FUTEX_WAKE_OP (pthread_cond_signal speedup) Message-ID: <20050823144230.GB7403@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20050823131817.GA7403@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:36:08AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote: > a detail: many of the futex_atomic_op_inuser() seem to be duplicated > across architectures. Might be worth putting into asm-generic, to avoid > the duplication? Those are stub files waiting for arch maintainers to actually implement them, so they will be eventually different, but for the time being they just -ENOSYS, so that things compile. Jakub