From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: /dev/rob0 Subject: Re: ROUTE woes ? Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: <200508231529.25465.rob0@gmx.co.uk> References: <20050823201959.3AC9E49EE@sorry.no-ip-here.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050823201959.3AC9E49EE@sorry.no-ip-here.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tuesday 2005-August-23 15:20, Ruben Cardenal wrote: > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-extra.html#pom-extra-ROUTE > > In order to be able to use it, you must download also iptables and > patch-o-matic and compile all the needed stuff. The order is > > a) Apply patch-o-matic against the iptables source > b) Compile and install iptables > c) Recompile your kernel to generate the ipt_ROUTE module (the > prior iptables configuration will add it to your kernel tree). If all netfilter drivers were built as modules, is an entire compile / reboot necessary? Can you just get away with a "make modules" (and "make modules_install") if the POM drivers are the only thing you're changing? I'd like to play with POM sometime, but I don't reboot if I can avoid it. :) -- mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header