All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk queue io tracing support
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:25:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050824072501.GA27992@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050824171931.H4209301@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>

On Wed, Aug 24 2005, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:08:10AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > ...
> > This isn't msec precision, it's usec. sched_clock() is in ns! I already
> > decided that msec is too coarse, but usec _should_ be enough.
> 
> Right you are (I was thinking m-for-micro, not m-for-milli in my head ;)
> - but still, there doesn't seem to be any reason for that divide-by-1000
> and reducing the precision in the kernel rather than in userspace, does
> there?  Doing it the other way means you wont ever have to worry about
> whether it is/isn't sufficient precision for all possible block devices,
> and the precision the tool displays will just be a userspace decision.

I was just worried about wrapping of ->time, but I did make it a 64-bit
unit. So I guess we could go to nsec granularity, there should be plenty
[*] of space. I'll change that too, I'll post an update version later.

* I probably should not make such a statement :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-24  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-23 12:32 [PATCH] blk queue io tracing support Jens Axboe
2005-08-24  1:03 ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-24  7:08   ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-24  7:19     ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-24  7:25       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-08-24  9:28         ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-29  4:53           ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-29  5:57             ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-30 23:43           ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  7:31             ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-30 23:48           ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-30 23:58             ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  4:19               ` Tom Zanussi
2005-08-31  4:33                 ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  4:53                   ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  4:55                   ` Tom Zanussi
2005-08-31  7:33             ` Jens Axboe
2005-09-02 11:20             ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-24  6:24 ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-24  7:08   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050824072501.GA27992@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathans@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.