From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E7n1f-0000NZ-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:38:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E7n1U-0000Fy-5E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:38:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7n1T-0000Ak-OI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:37:59 -0400 Received: from [66.54.152.27] (helo=jive.SoftHome.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E7mtA-0000Cp-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:29:25 -0400 From: Mulyadi Santosa Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] const / static (against current CVS) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:24:44 +0700 References: <20050823174026.GA27203@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050823174026.GA27203@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508241024.44059.a_mulyadi@softhome.net> Reply-To: a_mulyadi@softhome.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas Mohr Hello Andreas! > Introduction part: > ---------- > I'm doing a performance tuning effort all over the place in > frequently-used Linux programs: > I'm trying to mark as many data areas as possible const (and static) > in various programs (at those places where it's actually feasible, > that is). Great! Damn, never think to do something like this before. Anyway, do you get any speed improvement when using this patch? or smaller memory consumption? regards Mulyadi