From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: serue@us.ibm.com
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
linux-security-module@wirex.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:41:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050826164139.GK7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050826092306.GA429@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
* serue@us.ibm.com (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> Here are some numbers on a 4way x86 - PIII 700Mhz with 1G memory (hmm,
> highmem not enabled). I should hopefully have a 2way ppc available
> later today for a pair of runs.
Thanks for running these numbers Serge.
> dbench and tbench were run 50 times each, kernbench and reaim 10 times
> each. Results are mean +/- 95% confidence half-interval. Kernel had
> selinux and capabilities compiled in.
>
> A little surprising: kernbench is improved, but dbench and tbench
> are worse - though within the 95% CI.
It is interesting. Would be good to see what happens with the cap_ bits
used in SELinux instead of secondary callout. Also, need to run ia64,
do you have an ia64 box?
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-26 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-25 1:20 [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] Use capabilities as default w/ and w/out CONFIG_SECURITY Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] Rework stubs in security.h Chris Wright
2005-08-26 17:31 ` Tony Jones
2005-08-26 17:59 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-26 18:03 ` Tony Jones
2005-08-26 18:00 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-26 18:08 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-26 18:11 ` Tony Jones
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] Call security hooks conditionally if the security_op is filled out Chris Wright
2005-08-25 8:50 ` Kurt Garloff
2005-08-25 16:24 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] Remove unnecessary default capability callbacks Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] Remove unnecesary capability hooks in rootplug Chris Wright
2005-08-25 14:38 ` serue
2005-08-25 15:13 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-25 16:21 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 16:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-25 17:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 21:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 16:28 ` serue
2005-08-25 21:12 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-31 6:34 ` Greg KH
2005-08-31 15:09 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 4:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates James Morris
2005-08-25 5:32 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 19:15 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-26 9:23 ` serue
2005-08-26 13:27 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-26 10:30 ` serue
2005-08-26 16:41 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-08-26 17:35 ` serue
2005-08-26 17:49 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 9:52 ` serue
2005-08-25 10:18 ` serue
2005-08-25 16:19 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050826164139.GK7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.