From: Kent Robotti <dwilson24@nyc.rr.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:45:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050827224555.GA1731@Linux.nyc.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050827212817.GA2951@taniwha.stupidest.org>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:28:17PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> How about you do a little research on some things for a bit? The
> initramfs code is done the way it is for a good reason. cpio is used
> over tar for another good reason.
Why don't you do some research on manners?
> You are most welcome to disagree and even voice you disagreement, but
> there comes a point where you really need to produce some better
> arguments. Patches wouldn't hurt either.
Are you satisfied ass?????
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-27 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-27 8:19 Initramfs and TMPFS! Kent Robotti
2005-08-27 21:28 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-27 21:42 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-27 22:45 ` Kent Robotti [this message]
2005-08-27 22:42 ` David Weinehall
2005-08-27 22:57 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-08-27 23:38 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-27 23:41 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-08-28 0:21 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-08-28 5:36 ` Willy Tarreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-03 8:29 Chuck Ebbert
[not found] <4Fuuy-6df-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4FJMZ-1YX-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-08-26 15:49 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-08-26 6:09 Kent Robotti
2005-08-26 1:39 dwilson24
2005-08-26 19:06 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-26 20:08 ` Kent Robotti
2005-08-26 20:22 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-26 21:34 ` Kent Robotti
[not found] ` <20050826211231.GA957@Linux.nyc.rr.com>
[not found] ` <20050827004045.GA17686@taniwha.stupidest.org>
2005-08-27 3:21 ` Kent Robotti
2005-08-27 4:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 19:32 dwilson24
2005-08-25 19:05 Alan Jenkins
2005-08-26 10:37 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-26 19:08 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 18:23 robotti
2005-08-25 18:15 robotti
2005-08-25 19:10 ` Ian Campbell
2005-08-26 10:29 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-25 15:38 robotti
2005-08-25 16:00 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-26 19:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 15:34 robotti
2005-08-25 15:54 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-26 15:03 ` Horst von Brand
2005-08-25 4:35 robotti
2005-08-25 13:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 4:32 robotti
2005-08-25 13:47 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-24 22:41 robotti
2005-08-25 3:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-24 3:15 robotti
2005-08-23 22:05 robotti
2005-08-24 2:57 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-24 20:52 ` Wakko Warner
2005-08-24 20:59 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-23 21:16 robotti
2005-08-23 21:24 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-08-25 3:14 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050827224555.GA1731@Linux.nyc.rr.com \
--to=dwilson24@nyc.rr.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.